Skip to main content

Table 3 Multivariate-adjusted OR and 95% CI for having abdominal adiposity, overweight and obesity across tertiles of DDS

From: The association between dietary diversity score and general and abdominal obesity in Iranian children and adolescents

Variables

Analysis model

1st (n = 166)

2nd (n = 146)

3rd (n = 144)

P trend

OR

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

Over weight

Crude

1

1.89 (1.11–3.32)

2.13 (1.26–3.61)

0.005

Model I

1

2.15 (1.25–3.72)

2.29 (1.34–3.93)

0.003

Model II

1

2.14 (1.21–3.78)

2.18 (1.24–3.82)

0.007

Model III

1

1.38 (0.72–2.63)

0.93 (0.48–1.82)

0.8

Obesity

Crude

1

2.6 (1.03–6.57)

3.45 (1.41–8.47)

0.007

Model I

1

2.91 (1.13–7.48)

3.58 (1.44–8.88)

0.006

Model II

1

2.77 (1.02–7.56)

3.26 (1.24–8.40)

0.02

Model III

1

2.09 (0.66–6.58)

1.75 (0.57–5.35)

0.41

Abdominal obesity

Crude

1

2.22 (0.86–5.73)

3.45 (1.41–8.47)

0.006

Model I

1

2.35 (0.9–6.14)

3.51 (1.42–8.68)

0.006

Model II

1

2.20 (0.78–6.19)

3.26 (1.21–8.75)

0.02

Model III

1

1.46 (0.45–4.73)

1.68 (0.55–5.14)

0.38

Model IV

1

0.66 (0.11–3.98)

2.16 (0.38–8.32)

0.24

  1. Overweight and obesity were defined based on 85th ≤ BMI <95th and ≥ 95th percentiles of BMI, respectively. Also abdominal obesity was considered as WC ≥ 85th percentiles
  2. Model I: adjusted for age and sex
  3. Model II: further adjusted for physical activity
  4. Model III: more adjustment for total energy intake
  5. Model IV: additionally adjusted for BMI