Two-stage, school and community-based population screening successfully identifies individuals and families at high-risk for type 2 diabetes: the Feel4Diabetes-study

Table 4 Prevalence of high normal blood pressure and hypertension in parents participated in the second-stage screening

	I	II	III	IVParticipants as presented in column III, stratified by FINDRISC category			P-value*
	Participants identified with high normal blood pressure, n (%)	Participants identified with hypertension, n (%)	Participants not receiving antihypertensive treatment among those identified with hypertension, n (%)
		Participants identified with hypertension, n (%)		0–11	12–14	15–26
All countries (n = 2723)	382 (14.0)	507 (18.6)	407 (80.3)	231 (89.2)^a,b	116 (77.1)^a,c	60 (61.7)^b,c	< 0.001
HICs under austerity measures (n = 1261)	154 (12.2)	156 (12.4)	121 (77.5)	74 (88.8)^a	31 (73.2)	16 (53.3)^a	< 0.001
LMICs (n = 582)	74 (12.7)	119 (20.5)	84 (70.8)	41 (79.6)	29 (68.3)	14 (56.5)	0.121
HICs (n = 880)	154 (17.5)	232 (26.4)	202 (87.0)	117 (93.3)^a	55 (85.5)	30 (70.7)^a	0.001

*P-values indicate the significance of the differences among FINDRISC categories
Figures sharing the same superscript letters differentiate significantly from each other
FINDRISC Finnish Diabetes Risk Score, HICs High-income countries, LMICs Low to middle-income countries

ISSN: 1472-6823