Skip to main content

Table 2 Descriptive characteristics of parents and children of families participated in the second-stage screening by region

From: Two-stage, school and community-based population screening successfully identifies individuals and families at high-risk for type 2 diabetes: the Feel4Diabetes-study

 

Total sample

HICs under austerity measures

LMICs

HICs

P-value*

Parents

(n = 2849)

(n = 1385)

(n = 624)

(n = 840)

 

 Age (years)

41.1 (5.56)

42.4 (5.32)a,b

39.6 (5.40)a

40.1 (5.60)b

< 0.001

 Females, n (%)

1875 (65.8)

837 (60.4)a,b

464 (74.4)a

574 (68.3)b

< 0.001

Occupation, n (%)

 Work full- time

1875 (65.8)

885 (63.9)a

445 (71.3)a,b

545 (64.8)b

< 0.001

 Work part- time

335 (11.7)

154 (11.1)a,b

41 (6.5)b,c

140 (16.7)a,c

 

 Stay at home parent

345 (12.1)

203 (14.7)a

83 (13.3)b

59 (7.0)a,b

 

 Unemployed

139 (4.9)

112 (8.1)a,b

8 (1.3)a

19 (2.3)b

 

 Full-time education

31 (1.1)

4 (0.3)a,b

8 (1.3)a

19 (2.3)b

 

 Other**

124 (4.4)

27 (1.9)a,b

39 (6.3)a

58 (6.9)b

 

Educational level, n (%)

  < 12 years

673 (23.6)

373 (26.9)a

160 (25.6)b

140 (16.7)a,b

< 0.001

  ≥ 12 years

2176 (76.4)

1012 (73.1)a

464 (74.4)b

700 (83.3)a,b

 

Weight status, n (%)

 Overweight

1006 (35.3)

506 (36.5)a

185 (29.6)a,b

315 (37.5)b

< 0.001

 Obese

1045 (36.7)

550 (39.7)a

203 (32.6)a

292 (34.8)

 

Children

(n = 2711)

(n = 1089)

(n = 753)

(n = 869)

 

 Age (years)

8.16 (1.02)

7.80 (0.93)a,b

8.43 (1.00)a

8.36 (1.00)b

< 0.001

 Females, n (%)

1385 (51.1)

549 (50.4)

393 (52.2)

443 (51.0)

0.752

  1. Data are means (SD) except where noted otherwise
  2. *P-values indicate the significance of the differences among regions
  3. Figures sharing the same superscript letters differentiate significantly from each other
  4. **Other includes “retired” and “something else”
  5. HICs High-income countries, LMICs Low to middle-income countries