Skip to main content

Table 4 Mortality and other outcomes for patients with and without cancer in patients receiving structured or routine care during 19 years of follow up

From: The impact of cancer on diabetes outcomes

 

No. of patients with outcome during 19 years of follow up (n (%))

Incidence rate (events per 1000 patient years, 95% CI)

Hazard ratioa (95% CI) for structured care versus routine careb

P valuec

Inter-ac-tion P valued

Structured personal care

Routine care

Structured personal care

Routine care

All-cause mortality

 Cancer

147 (84.5)

101 (86.3)

220.1 (185.9–258.7)

237.0 (193.1–288.1)

0.97 (0.67–1.41)

0.89

0.65

 No cancer

375 (63.9)

343 (68.2)

45.8 (41.3–50.7)

51.2 (45.9–56.9)

0.89 (0.76–1.03)

0.12

Diabetes-related deaths

 Cancer

58 (33.5)

38 (32.5)

86.8 (65.9–112.3)

89.2 (63.1–122.5)

1.01 (0.63–1.63)

0.96

0.75

 No cancer

269 (45.9)

240 (47.9)

32.8 (29.0–37.0)

35.8 (31.4–40.6)

0.93 (0.77–1.13)

0.46

Any diabetes-related endpoint

 Cancer

79 (53.4)

58 (61.1)

339.8 (269.0–423.6)

612.5 (465.0–792.2)

0.75 (0.49–1.16)

0.19

0.81

 No cancer

331 (70.6)

314 (75.3)

58.9 (52.8–65.7)

71.1 (63.5–79.4)

0.80 (0.68–0.93)

0.005

Myocardial infarction

 Cancer

42 (25.2)

34 (31.2)

77.0 (55.5–104.1)

114.9 (79.5–160.7)

0.94 (0.53–1.69)

0.84

0.50

 No cancer

177 (33.5)

176 (38.8)

23.7 (20.3–27.5)

29.5 (25.3–34.2)

0.76 (0.62–0.94)

0.011

Stroke

 Cancer

23 (13.9)

19 (17.6)

43.4 (27.4–65.1)

53.9 (32.4–84.3)

0.65 (0.30–1.41)

0.27

0.38

 No cancer

133 (23.7)

127 (26.3)

17.8 (14.9–21.1)

21.0 (17.5–25.0)

0.94 (0.74–1.11)

0.60

Peripheral vascular disease

 Cancer

4 (2.3)

4 (3.5)

6.1 (1.6–15.8)

9.8 (2.6–25.4)

0.85 (0.49–1.48)

0.99

0.88

 No cancer

31 (5.3)

30 (6.0)

3.8 (2.6–5.5)

4.6 (3.1–6.5)

0.99 (0.16–6.13)

0.57

Microvascular disease

 Cancer

20 (11.6)

13 (11.1)

33.4 (20.4–51.7)

33.3 (17.7–56.2)

1.35 (0.51–3.57)

0.37

0.39

 No cancer

78 (13.3)

70 (13.9)

9.9 (7.8–12.4)

11.0 (8.6–13.9)

0.85 (0.60–1.21)

0.55

  1. aThe hazard ratio (HR) is calculated in a Cox proportional hazard regression model where the first cancer diagnosis is a time-varying covariate. The corresponding 95% CI and P values are determined using a sandwich estimator for the variance to account for clustering of patients within practices
  2. bAdjusted for age, sex and clustering, as well as for the following variables at diagnosis: live alone, basic school education, body mass index, hypertension, diagnostic fasting plasma glucose, total cholesterol, sedentary physical activity, and current smoking
  3. cTests the effect of randomization within patient groups with and without cancer. dTests whether the effect of randomization is different between patient groups with and without cancer
  4. The effectiveness of the intervention