Skip to main content

Advertisement

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

  • Published:

Testing for type 1 diabetes autoantibodies in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM): is it clinically useful?

Abstract

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is the most common metabolic disorder in pregnancy, and it is associated with increased risk of morbidity in maternal-fetal outcomes. GDM is also associated with a higher risk to develop diabetes in the future. Diabetes-related autoantibodies (AABs) have been detected in a small percentage (usually less than 10%) of women with gestational diabetes. The prevalence in gestational diabetes of these autoimmune markers of type 1 diabetes (T1D) has been assessed in many studies, together with the risk of progression of AABs-positive GDM towards impaired glucose regulation (IFG or IGT) and overt diabetes after pregancy. The question whether it is necessary to test for T1D autoantibodies in all pregnancies with GDM is still debated. Here we examine the epidemiology of T1D autoantibodies in GDM, their clinical relevance in term of future risk of diabetes or impaired glucose regulation and in term of maternal-fetal outcomes, and discuss when it may be the most appropriate time to search for T1D autoantibodies in women with gestational diabetes.

Background

Epidemiology of T1D autoantibodies in GDM

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is the most common metabolic disorder in pregnancy, with prevalence between 2 and 17% depending on the genetic background of the studied population [1,2,3]. GDM is defined as carbohydrate intolerance diagnosed in the second or third trimester of pregnancy that was not clearly overt diabetes prior to gestation [4]. According to this definition, conditions leading to beta cell deficiency during pregnancy may reveal as GDM, triggered by the impairment in insulin action that physiologically appears during pregnancy, aimed at favouring fetal growth. Normally the β-cell pool adapts to physiological needs and increased functional demands [5]. However, if this state of insulin resistance (IR) is not compensated by an increase in beta-cell insulin secretion, it determines the appearance of GDM and provides a higher risk to develop type 2 diabetes (T2D) [6]. Epidemiological data shows that in a subgroup of women, estimated to be between 0 and 10% [7] of all GDM cases, carbohydrate intolerance is associated with the presence of autoimmunity against β-cells. In these women there is a higher risk of progression to type 1 diabetes (T1D) and/or Latent Autoimmune Diabetes of Adulthood (LADA) after pregnancy [2, 7,8,9,10,11]. In rare occasions, autoimmune diabetes makes it first appearance in pregnancy as diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) [12, 13]. When DKA is encountered in pregnancy the possibility of unrecognized pre-existing diabetes (mostly autoimmune) should be strongly considered. Pregnancy itself is a condition that predisposes to ketoacidosis, for example through nausea and vomiting in the first trimester, or insulin-resistance and increased lipolysis in the second and third trimesters [14].

Islet-cell autoantibodies, the markers of beta-cell autoimmunity, are present in sera from women with GDM with variable frequency. The prevalence of diabetes-related autoimmunity in pregnancy is extremely variable depending on the type of the autoantibody under study, the method for detection, and the population under observation.

Many studies have assessed the prevalence of diabetes-related autoantibodies in women with GDM, searching for ICA (islet cell autoantibody), IAA (insulin autoantibody), GADA (glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody), IA-2A (tyrosine phosphatase-like islet antigen autoantibody) and, recently, ZnT8-A (Zinc trasporter 8 autoantibody).

In general, titres for all autoantibodies are lower in GDM patients than in cases of newly diagnosed T1D [6, 15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23] or in first-degree relatives of patients with T1D [24, 25]. These AABs’ titres are similar to those observed in LADA patients, and are considered indicative of a slow-developing autoimmune process in women with GDM that are positive for diabetes-related autoimmune markers [7, 26].

With regards to the prevalence of individual AABs, ICA studies showed a variable prevalence between 1 and 35% [7]. Nonetheless, because of technical (standardization) and methodological (test variability) issues, ICA are now less often measured [2728].

As for the other beta-cell autoantibodies, reports on the differences in autoantibodies frequencies and titres between GDM and control women have been conflicting, especially for GADA and IA2-A. The results of studies on GADA in GDM patients and controls vary widely; the overall frequencies of GADA range between 0 and 10.8% [7, 9, 19,20,21,22, 24, 29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43] (Fig. 1), with some studies showing higher frequency in GDM [9, 21, 22, 30, 39], and other no differences [19, 33,34,35, 43, 44]. Also GADA titres have been reported higher in GDM women in some studies [9, 21, 22, 30, 31], with others showing no difference [33,34,35,36,37]. As for the frequency of IA-2A positivity, this ranges from 0 to 6.2% (Fig. 1) [20, 21, 30, 38] with some papers [21, 30, 39] reporting a higher frequency in GDM patients than in normal controls (up to 26% in only one study [35], while others found no difference [9, 19]. Such contrasting results may be due to different genetic backgrounds within populations, since it is common knowledge that ethnicity plays an important role in determining beta-cell autoimmunity. Finally, a low frequency of IAA (Fig. 1) in GDM patients is reported in the literature [8, 15, 16, 19, 40], and only few studies found a different prevalence of IAA positivity in GDM patients than in the control women [9, 39], also confirming that IAA are more typical in younger ages [45].

Fig. 1
figure1

Autoantibodies prevalence in women with GDM. Prevalence of ICA, GADA, IA2-A and ZnT8-A in different studies

The last beta-cell autoantibody to be discovered, ZnT8-A, was shown in a study by Rudland et al. to be the most represented in their GDM cohort, with a prevalence of 4.8%, also associating with higher basal blood glucose values compared to the other AABs [41]. In a more recent study Dereke and collaborators found that 6.8% of GDM women were autoantibody-positive, and 3.2% resulted ZnT8-A positive (Fig.1). Of the autoantibody-positive women with GDM who developed postpartum T1D, that were approximately 19%, all were positive for GADA. It seems therefore that ZnT8A does not have additional predictive values over GADA in the postpartum development of autoimmune diabetes [42].

Finally, very few studies have been conducted on populations with a high genetic risk for autoimmune diabetes, and they have shown a different prevalence of autoantibodies positivity in GDM between studies. For example, in a Finnish population, Jarvela et al. [9] observed a prevalence of autoimmunity of 16.7% in women with GDM vs. 2.8% in controls. Murgia et al. [39] reported in Sardinia a prevalence of 38.8% for at least one AAB vs 7.1% in control women; Cossu and co-workers [43] reported instead an overall prevalence of AABs of 6.4% in Sardinian women, a prevalence that was not different between GDM (5.6%) and control (8.3%) women (Fig. 1). This variability seems to be due to sample selection, screening criteria, different autoimmune measurement tools, all that could lead to conflicting results.

Risk associated with AABs positivity to develop future T1D, LADA or impaired glucose regulation (IGR)

The development of an autoimmune or a non-autoimmune form of GDM depends on a pregnant woman’s genetic susceptibility. GDM may facilitate the identification of women at risk of developing diabetes later in life, and the presence of autoimmunity in GDM helps to estimate the risk of future type 1 or type 2 diabetes [46]. In particular, the risk of future T1D rises with increasing number of positive autoantibodies.

In this respect, it has been estimated that the risk of developing type 1diabetes two years post-partum is 17% in the presence of a single autoantibody, increases up to 61% in the presence of 2 autoantibodies, and to 84% when 3 autoantibodies are present [30]. In this study, among all antibodies tested, GADA had the highest accuracy in predicting autoimmune diabetes (sensitivity 63%) compared to ICA (48%) or IA2 (34%), but, overall, the presence of single GAD autoantibodies appeared to have limited predictive power, as described also for patients with LADA [26]. Löbner and collaborators reported that 96% of GDM women with at least one positive antibody (GADA or IA2-A) develop T1D within 8 years after delivery [47]. A Finnish population study [9] reports that 10% of women with a previous GDM develop type 1 diabetes within 6 years; the risk for type 1 diabetes correlates with an age under 30 years, with the need for insulin therapy during pregnancy, and with a positivity for at least 1 antibody. Another study reports an onset of T1D after 1 year of 50% in AABs-positive GDM women, and of 21% of IFG or IGT [10]. In a recent work from our group, women followed for 2 years after pregnancy had a 2.65 greater risk of having impaired glucose regulation when T1D-related autoantibodies where present, suggesting a continuing damage to beta-cells by the autoimmune process [43].

Overall, understanding the etiopathogenesis (i.e. autoimmune or non-autoimmune) of GDM is useful to evaluate the future risk of glycaemic alterations. The real question is “when it is useful to search for an autoimmune-diabetes related diagnosis?”

When to search for T1D autoantibodies: is it useful during pregnancy?

The issue is whether autoimmune screening in women with GDM does offer clinical benefits, or, on the contrary, it may represent unnecessary health expenditure.

The overall prevalence of GDM has been constantly increasing through the years, reflecting the background prevalence of obesity and T2DM in the general population [48,49,50,51]. It is well known however that the autoimmune form of GDM represents a small proportion (0–10%) compared to all cases of GDM [2, 7]. A universal autoimmune screening in all GDM women may expose them to unjustified strain at a particular distressful time like pregnancy [52], also in consideration to the fact that GDM women with and without AABs have similar clinical outcomes (see below) [22, 41, 43, 53].

So far, data on the predictive power of individual or specific clinical features are discordant in literature; some authors, including ourselves, do not find dissimilarities in clinical features between women with and without autoimmune GDM [19, 43, 54, 55]. Other authors report that autoimmune GDM may be associated with a lower BMI, a more frequent need to receive insulin therapy and more severe clinical manifestations, such as higher blood glucose levels [30, 56]. However, data are inconclusive and the question is still open.

The screening for autoantibodies would probably be more indicated only when GDM is associated with the cluster of clinical features suggestive of a T1D-like form of GDM, for example when two or more parameters such as young age, low body mass index (BMI), early need for insulin therapy, presence of ketones, co-presence of other autoimmune condition (e.g. thyroiditis) are existing at the same time.

Also, several studies report no differences in maternal-fetal outcomes between women with or without autoimmunity [22, 41, 53], implying that hyperglycaemia per se (i.e. glucotoxicity for the fetus), whatever the cause, is the key determinant of these pregnancy outcomes [57]. This is an important point favouring not to measure autoantibodies during pregnancy in all GDM women. In a study by Lapolla et al. [40] pancreatic autoimmunity in GDM shows a low proportion, and it is shown that anti-GAD antibodies can, instead, appear after delivery. In fact, typical immunosuppression of the mother during pregnancy determines a reduction in the titres of some organ-specific antibodies. It is well known that, during pregnancy, the immune system shift towards a Th2-mediated immunomodulation, which is capable of suppressing autoimmunity and protecting from infections. Inversely, when in the post-partum period Th2-type cytokines decrease, worsening of Th1-mediated autoimmune disorders has been observed. The immune system is hence capable to influence autoimmunity in pregnancy, positively during the gestational period and negatively, even decades later, in the postpartum [58]. There is therefore the possibility to have false-negative cases if AABs are tested during pregnancy. Consequently, it has been proposed to carry out autoantibody re-valuation a few months after delivery [10], when it could be the time for a more useful autoimmune evaluation.

When to search for T1D autoantibodies: is it useful after pregnancy?

As recommended by current guidelines, women with GDM should repeat an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) after 6–12 weeks from delivery; however, a significant percentage of these women do not repeat the OGTT [3, 59,60,61,62]. This observation highlights the need for more information to the patients on the long-term complications of GDM, in order to increase the chances for prevention of diabetes, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular complications. The control of the metabolic state after childbirth in women with previous GDM is necessary for the future health of the woman [63]. It has to be strongly recommended by professionals who treat women at the time of pregnancy, also in order to assess the risk of future onset of diabetes.

Follow-up studies have show that overt diabetes appears usually from the first year after delivery onward. In the study from Nilsson et al. [64], for example, less than 20% of AABs-ve GDM women developed T1D within 1 year after pregnancy, with the vast majority developing T1D later. So, in the rare cases of T1D developing soon after delivery, following recommendation for an OGTT within 6–12 weeks from childbirth would prevent missing these cases.

In the context of the follow up, the evaluation of autoimmunity in women with a phenotype suggestive of an autoimmune form of diabetes may be indicated. As discussed above, the period after childbirth, compared to pregnancy, is a time more indicative of the real autoimmune status of women. Thus, based on results from others and ourselves, in the presence of persistent glucose impairment and in the absence of evident features of insulin-resistance, the determination of diabetes-related autoimmunity in the follow-up of GDM women should be recommended. Indeed, we observed a persistence of glucose abnormalities in AABs-positive women after almost 2 years of follow-up, which resulted in a 2.65 relative risk (RR) of glucose impairment in AABs-positive women [43]. Also Lundberg et al. [65] observed that the combination of OGTT and GAD autoantibodies post-partum identified women with impaired β–cell function, whom should be followed with special focus on the risk of developing autoimmune diabetes.

Conclusions

From several epidemiological studies it appears that diabetes-related autoimmunity is not a main factor in the aetiology of GDM, accounting for less than 10% of all cases. GADA are the most common autoantibody compared to the other AABs, but autoantibodies show similar frequencies in GDM and NGT women [19, 31, 43, 44], suggesting that there is not a strong correlation between autoantibody-positivity and beta-cell impairment. In general [19, 54, 55], specific clinical features predicting which GDM women are at higher risk for autoimmune GDM have not been established, and it is therefore not possible to exactly define which patients to screen for autoantibodies during pregnancy.

Also, several studies report no differences in maternal-fetal outcomes between women with or without autoimmunity, suggesting that hyperglycaemia per se, whatever the cause, is the leading determinant of pregnancy outcomes.

Therefore, as in the Practice Points summarized in Table 1, unless a cluster of clinical features strongly suggestive of a T1D-like form of GDM (young age, low BMI, early insulin therapy, presence of ketones) is present, autoantibody screening may not be needed, and can be postponed to the follow-up of GDM women, when, for example, a persistent impaired glucose regulation is observed and may be indicative of an unremitting altered beta-cell function.

Table 1 Summary of practice points regarding autoimmune GDM in the clinical setting

References

  1. 1.

    Corrado F, D’Anna R, Cannata ML, Caputo F, Rizzo P, Cannizzaro D, et al. Prevalence of risk factors in the screening of carbohydrate intolerance in pregnancy. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2006;16(1):79e80.

  2. 2.

    Buchanan TA, Xiang A, Kjos SL, Watanabe R. What is gestational diabetes? Diabetes Care. 2007;30(Suppl 2):S105–11.

  3. 3.

    Hunt KJ, Schuller KL. The Increasing Prevalence of Diabetes in Pregnancy Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2007;34(2):173–99 vii.

  4. 4.

    Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2017: Summary of Revisions Diabetes Care 2017;40:S4-s5.

  5. 5.

    Ballesteros M, Simón I, Vendrell J, Ceperuelo-Mallafré V, Miralles RM, Albaiges G, et al. Maternal and cord blood adiponectin multimeric forms in gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective analysis. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(11):2418–23.

  6. 6.

    Kim C, Newton KM, Knopp RH. Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(10):1862–8.

  7. 7.

    Lapolla A, Dalfra MG, Fedele D. Diabetes related autoimmunity in gestational diabetes mellitus: is it important? Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2009;19:674–82.

  8. 8.

    Mauricio D, Balsells M, Morales J, Corcoy R, Puig-Domingo M, de Leiva A. Islet cell autoimmunity in women with gestational diabetes and risk of progression to insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Rev. 1996;12(4):275e85.

  9. 9.

    Järvelä IY, Juutinen J, Koskela P, Hartikainen AL, Kulmala P, Knip M, et al. Gestational diabetes identifies women at risk for permanent type 1 and type 2 diabetes in fertile age: predictive role of autoantibodies. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:607–12.

  10. 10.

    Nilsson C, Ursing D, Torn C, Aberg A, Landin-Olsson M. Presence of GAD antibodies during gestational diabetes mellitus predicts type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1968–71.

  11. 11.

    Wucher H, Lepercq J, Timsit J. Onset of autoimmune type 1 diabetes during pregnancy: prevalence and outcomes. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;24(4):617–24.

  12. 12.

    Parker JA, Conway DL. Diabetic ketoacidosis in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am. 2007;34(3):533–43.

  13. 13.

    Sills IN, Rapaport R. New-onset IDDM presenting with diabetic ketoacidosis in a pregnant adolescent. Diabetes Care. 1994;17(8):904–5.

  14. 14.

    Dalfrà MG, Burlina S, Sartore G, Lapolla A. Ketoacidosis in diabetic pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(17):2889–95.

  15. 15.

    Damm P, Kuhl C, Buschard K, Jakobsen BK, Svejgaard A, Sodoyez-Goffaux F, et al. Prevalence and predictive value of islet cell antibodies and insulin autoantibodies in women with gestational diabetes. Diabet Med. 1994;11(6):558e63.

  16. 16.

    Stowers JM, Sutherland HW, Kerridge DF. Long-range implications for the mother. The Aberdeen experience Diabetes. 1985;34(Suppl. 2):106e10.

  17. 17.

    Catalano PM, Tyzbir ED, Sims EA. Incidence and significance of islet cell antibodies in women with previous gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1990;13(5):478e82.

  18. 18.

    Mauricio D, Corcoy R, Codina M, Balsells M, Puig Domingo M, Pou JM, et al. (Islet cell antibodies identify a subset of gestational diabetic women with higher risk of developing diabetes mellitus shortly after pregnancy. Diabetes Nutr Metab 1992;5:237e41.

  19. 19.

    Dozio N, Beretta A, Belloni C, Castiglioni M, Rosa S, Bosi E, et al. Low prevalence of islet autoantibodies in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1997;20(1):81e3.

  20. 20.

    Whittingham S, Byron SL, Tuomilehto J, Zimmet PZ, Myers MA, Vidgren G, et al. Autoantibodies associated with presymptomatic insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in women. Diabet Med. 1997;14(8):678e85.

  21. 21.

    Kinalski M, Kretowski A, Telejko B, Kowalska I, Bingley P, Kinalska I. Prevalence of ICA antibodies, anti-GAD and anti-IA2 in women with gestational diabetes treated with diet. Przegl Lek. 1999;56(5):342e6.

  22. 22.

    Bo S, Menato G, Pinach S, Signorile A, Bardelli C, Lezo A, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcome of pregnancy in women with gestational hyperglycemia with and without antibodies to beta-cell antigens. Diabet Med. 2003;20(1):64e8.

  23. 23.

    Palmer JP, Asplin CM, Clemons P, Lyen K, Tatpati O, Raghu PK, et al. Insulin antibodies in insulin-dependent diabetics before insulin treatment. Science. 1983;222(4630):1337e9.

  24. 24.

    deLeiva A, Mauricio D, Corcoy R Diabetes-related autoantibodies and gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007;30 Suppl 2:S127–133.

  25. 25.

    Incani M, Serafini C, Satta C, Perra L, Scano F, Frongia P, et al. High prevalence of diabetes specific autoimmunity in first-degree relatives of Sardinian patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2017;33(3):e2864.

  26. 26.

    Gale EAM. Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults: a guide for the perplexed. Diabetologia. 2005;48(2):2195e9.

  27. 27.

    Bingley PJ. Clinical Applications of Diabetes Antibody Testing The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2010;95(1):25–33.

  28. 28.

    Landin-Olsson M. Precision of the islet cell antibody assay depends on the pancreas. J Clin Lab Anal. 1990;4:289–94.

  29. 29.

    Dereke J, Nilsson C, Landin-Olsson M, Hillman M. Prevalence of zinc transporter 8 antibodies in gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2012;29(12):e436–9.

  30. 30.

    Fuchtenbusch M, Ferber K, Standl E, Ziegler AG. Prediction of type 1 diabetes postpartum in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus by combined islet cell autoantibody screening: a prospective multicenter study. Diabetes. 1997;46(9):1459–67.

  31. 31.

    Mitchell ML, Hermos RJ, Larson CA, Palomaki GE, Haddow JE. Prevalence of GAD autoantibodies in women with gestational diabetes: a retrospective analysis. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(11):1705e6.

  32. 32.

    Bartha JL, Martinez-del-Fresno P, Comino-Delgado R. Postpartum metabolism and autoantibody markers in women with gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed in early pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184(5):965e70.

  33. 33.

    Petersen JS, Dyrberg T, Damm P, Kuhl C, Molsted-Petersen L, Buschard K. GAD65 autoantibodies in women with gestational or insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus diagnosed during pregnancy. Diabetologia. 1996;39(11):1329e33.

  34. 34.

    Fallucca F, Tiberti C, Torresi P, Cardellini G, Sciullo E, D’Aliberti T, et al. Autoimmune markers of diabetes in diabetic pregnancy. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 1997;33(3):425e8.

  35. 35.

    Weng J, Ekelund M, Lehto M, Li H, Ekberg G, Frid A, et al. Screening for MODY mutations, GAD antibodies, and type 1 diabetes associated HLA genotypes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(1):68e71.

  36. 36.

    Damanhouri LH, Dromey JA, Christie MR, Narsrat HA, Ardawi SM, Robins RA, et al. Autoantibodies to GAD and IA-2 in Saudi Arabian diabetic patients. Diabet Med. 2005;22(4):448e52.

  37. 37.

    Ferraz TB, Motta RS, Capibaribe DM, Ferraz CL, Chacra A, Forti AC, et al. Prevalence of GAD autoantibodies in Brazilian women with previous gestational diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;78(1):141e2.

  38. 38.

    Albareda M, Caballero A, Badell G, Piquer S, Ortiz A, de Leiva A, et al. Diabetes and abnormal glucose tolerance in women with previous gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(4):1199e205.

  39. 39.

    Murgia C, Orru M, Portoghese E, Garau N, Zedda P, Berria R, et al. Autoimmunity in gestational diabetes mellitus in Sardinia: a preliminary case-control report. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2008;6:24.

  40. 40.

    Lapolla A, Fedele D, Pedini B, Dal Fra MG, Sanzari M, Masin M, et al. Low frequency of autoantibodies to islet cell, glutamic acid decarboxylase, and second-islet antigen in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus: a follow-up study. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;958:263–6.

  41. 41.

    Rudland VL, Pech C, Harding AJ, Tan K, Lee K, Molyneaux L, et al. Zinc transporter 8autoantibodies: what is their clinical relevance in gestational diabetes? Diabet Med. 2015;32:359–66.

  42. 42.

    Dereke J, Palmqvist S, Nilsson C, Landin-Olsson M, Hillman M. The prevalence and predictive value of the SLC30A8 R325W polymorphism and zinc transporter 8 autoantibodies in the development of GDM and postpartum type 1 diabetes. Endocrine. 2016;53(3):740–6.

  43. 43.

    Cossu E, Incani M, Pani MG, Gattu G, Serafini C, Strazzera A, et al. Presence of diabetes-specific autoimmunity in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) predicts impaired glucose regulation at follow-up. J Endocrinol Investig. 2018;41(9):1061–8.

  44. 44.

    Papadopoulou A, Lynch KF, Anderberg E, Landin-Olsson M, Hansson I, Agardh CD, et al. HLA-DQB1 genotypes and islet cell autoantibodies against GAD65 and IA-2 in relation to development of diabetes post partum in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;95(2):260–4.

  45. 45.

    Naserke HE, Dozio N, Ziegler AG, Bonifacio E. Comparison of a novel micro-assay for insulin autoantibodies with the conventional radiobinding assay. Diabetologia. 1998;41(6):681e3.

  46. 46.

    Haller-Kikkatalo K, Uibo R. Clinical recommendations for the use of islet cell autoantibodies to distinguish autoimmune and non-autoimmune gestational diabetes. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2016;50(1):23–33.

  47. 47.

    Löbner K, Knopff A, Baumgarten A, Mollenhauer U, Marienfeld S, Garrido-Franco M, et al. Predictors of postpartum diabetes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes. 2006;55(3):792–7.

  48. 48.

    Albrecht SS, Kuklina EV, Bansil P, Jamieson DJ, Whiteman MK, Kourtis AP, et al. Diabetes trends among delivery hospitalizations in the U.S., 1994-2004. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(4):768–73.

  49. 49.

    Owens-Gary MD, Ware J. Interventions to increase access to care and quality of care for women with gestational diabetes. Diabetes Spectr. 2012;25(1):26–8.

  50. 50.

    DeSisto CL, Kim SY, Sharma AJ. (Prevalence estimates of gestational diabetes mellitus in the United States, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2014;19;11:E104.

  51. 51.

    Mirghani Dirar A, Doupis J. Gestational diabetes from A to Z. World J Diabetes. 2017;15;8(12):489–511.

  52. 52.

    Parsons J, Sparrow K, Ismail K, Hunt K, Rogers H, Forbes A. Experiences of gestational diabetes and gestational diabetes care: a focus group and interview study BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;11;18(1):25.

  53. 53.

    Yu SH, Park S, Kim HS, Park SY, Yim CH, Han KO, et al. The prevalence of GAD antibodies in Korean women with gestational diabetes mellitus and their clinical characteristics during and after pregnancy. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2009;25:329–34.

  54. 54.

    Mauricio D, Corcoy R, Codina M, Morales J, Balsells M, de Leiva A. Islet cell antibodiesand beta-cell function in gestational diabetic women: comparison to first-degree relatives of type 1(insulin-dependent) diabetic subjects. Diabet Med. 1995;12:1009–14.

  55. 55.

    Fallucca F, Di Mario U, Gargiulo P, Iavicoli M, Galfo C, Contreas G, et al. Humoralimmunity in diabetic pregnancy: interrelationships with maternal/neonatal complications and maternal metabolic control. Diabetes Metab. 1985;11:387–95.

  56. 56.

    Wucher H, Lepercq J, Carette C, Colas C, Dubois-Laforgue D, Gautier JF, et al. Poor prognosis of pregnancy in women with autoimmune type 1 diabetes mellitus masquerading as gestational diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2011;37:47–51.

  57. 57.

    Hod M, Merlob P, Friedman S, Schoenfeld A, Ovadia J. Gestational diabetes mellitus. A survey of perinatal complications in the 1980s. Diabetes 1991;40 Suppl 2:74–78.

  58. 58.

    Piccinni MP, Lombardelli L, Logiodice F, Kullolli O, Parronchi P, Romagnani S. How pregnancy can affect autoimmune diseases progression? Clin Mol Allergy 2016;Sep 15;14:11.

  59. 59.

    Hunt KJ, Logan SL, Conway DL, Korte JE. Postpartum screening following GDM: howwell are we doing? Curr Diab Rep. 2010;10:235–41.

  60. 60.

    Butalia S, Donovan L, Savu A, Johnson J, Edwards A, Kaul P. Postpartum diabetes testing rate after gestational diabetes mellitus in Canadian women a population-based study. Can J Diabetes. 2017;41(6):613–20.

  61. 61.

    Metzger BE. (2007) long-term outcomes in mothers diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus and their offspring. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;50(4):972–9.

  62. 62.

    Corrado F, D’Anna R, Laganà AS, Di Benedetto A. Abnormal glucose tolerance later in life in women affected by glucose intolerance during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;34(2):123–6.

  63. 63.

    Buchanan TA, Page KA. Approach to the patient with gestational diabetes after delivery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(12):3592–8.

  64. 64.

    Nilsson C, Hillman M, Ursing D, Strevens H, Landin-Olsson M. Clinical use of C-peptide and β-cell specific autoantibodies during gestational diabetes mellitus. Practical Diabetes. 2012;29(3):105–8.

  65. 65.

    Lundberg TP, Højlund K, Snogdal LS, Jensen DM. Glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody-positivity post-partum is associated with impaired b–cell function in women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2015;32(2):198–205.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not Applicable.

Funding

This work was funded by research grants from the Regione Autonoma della Sardegna (Grant RAS 2007 n. CRP-59453), from Sapienza Ateneo Scientific Research (Research Projects 2016), and from the Foundation Banca d’Italia (Projects 2015) all awarded to Marco G. Baroni, and from the Foundation di Sardegna (Research Projects 2012-13n. 834/2012–0742) to Efisio Cossu.

The funders had no role on the study design, data analysis, interpretation and writing the manuscript in this study.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Author information

MGB conceived the paper and designed the work. MI anaylsed the data. MI, EC and MGB interpreted the data and drafted the work. MI, EC and MGB wrote the manuscript and approved the submitted version (and all the previous modified versions). MI EC and MGB agreed both to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work, even ones in which the author was not

Correspondence to Marco Giorgio Baroni.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable. This manuscript contains data from the literature.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

None of the authors have any competing interests.

personally involved, are appropriately investigated, resolved, and the resolution documented in the literature.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark