Skip to main content

Table 2 Association between TIR/HbA1c and IRSD/Education using unadjusted and adjusted models

From: Socioeconomic status and time in glucose target range in people with type 2 diabetes: a baseline analysis of the GP-OSMOTIC study

Variable

Unadjusted

Adjusteda

TIR

 

Mean difference in TIR (95% Confidence Interval)

Mean difference in TIR (95% Confidence Interval)

IRSD Decile

1.7% (0.7, 2.6)

1.5% (0.5, 2.5)

Educational attainment

 Trade/TAFE

−5.7% (−16.2, 4.8)

−4.9% (−15.0, 5.3)

 University/diploma

1.6% (−5.4, 8.7)

1.4% (− 5.5, 8.2)

HbA1c

 

Mean difference in HbA1c (95% Confidence Interval)

Mean difference in HbA1c (95% Confidence Interval)

IRSD Decile

−0.06% (− 0.1, − 0.01)

−0.06% (− 0.1, − 0.01)

Educational attainment

 Trade/TAFE

0.3% (− 0.06, 0.6)

0.2% (− 0.1, 0.6)

 University/diploma

− 0.07% (− 0.3, 0.2)

−0.08% (− 0.4, 0.2)

  1. aMultivariable analysis was adjusted for age, BMI, diet, exercise and study arm