Skip to main content

Table 2 Any diabetes-related outcome and all-cause mortality during 19 years of follow-up, according to socio-demographic group

From: Socio-demographic determinants and effect of structured personal diabetes care: a 19-year follow-up of the randomized controlled study diabetes Care in General Practice (DCGP)

 

No. of patients without outcome at

diabetes diagnosis

(routine/

structured)

No. (%) of patients with outcome

 

Absolute risk (events per 1000 patient years)

Hazard ratio (HR)a for structured- versus routine care (=reference group)

Routine care

Structured personal care

p valueb

Routine care

Structured personal care

p valuec

Adjusted for age, sex and clustering

p valued

Additionally adjusted for clinical and behavioral variablesf

p valued

Interaction p valuee

Educationf

Any diabetes-related endpoint

           

0.11

Basic

377/461

281 (74.5)

313 (67.9)

0.04

89.2

74.5

0.01

0.80 (0.67–0.94)

0.008

0.75 (0.63–0.89)

0.0008

 

Higher

108/124

72 (66.7)

74 (59.7)

0.27

61.5

53.0

0.31

0.94 (0.69–1.28)

0.69

1.01 (0.73–1.40)

0.97

 

All-cause mortality

           

0.35

Basic

459/574

343 (74.7)

410 (71.4)

0.26

66.4

63.0

0.45

0.94 (0.81–1.08)

0.37

0.90 (0.77–1.06)

0.20

 

Higher

129/149

78 (60.5)

84 (56.4)

0.56

47.8

43.0

0.48

1.03 (0.78–1.37)

0.84

1.06 (0.78–1.43)

0.73

 

Employment statusg

Any diabetes-related endpoint

           

0.50

Out of labor market

148/165

109 (73.7)

106 (64.2)

0.07

75.2

61.7

0.06

0.76 (0.58–1.01)

0.06

0.73 (0.55–0.97)

0.03

 

In labor market

148/192

90 (60.8)

108 (56.3)

0.38

51.5

44.4

0.23

0.87 (0.67–1.14)

0.32

0.84 (0.63–1.12)

0.23

 

All-cause mortality

           

0.87

Out of labor market

181/203

116 (64.1)

127 (62.6)

0.75

50.8

48.1

0.67

0.94 (0.74–1.20)

0.61

0.90 (0.69–1.18)

0.44

 

In labor market

157/208

62 (39.5)

78 (37.5)

0.69

25.2

24.1

0.76

1.02 (0.74–1.39)

0.92

0.93 (0.66–1.31)

0.68

 

Residence

Any diabetes-related endpoint

           

0.033

Rural

137/133

94 (68.6)

89 (66.9)

0.09

67.1

77.7

0.24

1.01 (0.75–1.36)

0.95

1.07 (0.77–1.48)

0.70

 

Urban

353/455

263 (74.5)

300 (65.9)

0.01

91.0

67.4

<0.0001

0.75 (0.63–0.88)

0.0007

0.71 (0.60–0.85)

0.0001

 

All-cause mortality

           

0.21

Rural

161/153

108 (67.1)

112 (73.2)

0.28

54.0

64.9

0.14

1.09 (0.83–1.43)

0.55

1.08 (0.83–1.42)

0.56

 

Urban

435/575

321 (73.8)

391 (68.0)

0.04

66.8

58.1

0.05

0.91 (0.78–1.06)

0.21

0.89 (0.75–1.05)

0.16

 

Civil status

Any diabetes-related endpoint

           

0.46

Living alone

158/176

120 (76.0)

127 (72.2)

0.42

101.6

92.7

0.41

0.83 (0.64–1.08)

0.16

0.88 (0.68–1.15)

0.36

 

Cohabiting

344/426

244 (70.9)

273 (64.1)

0.04

74.4

62.4

0.02

0.83 (0.70–0.98)

0.03

0.78 (0.65–0.93)

0.007

 

All-cause mortality

           

0.32

Living alone

198/236

167 (84.3)

195 (82.6)

0.62

87.5

85.1

0.80

0.84 (0.68–1.03)

0.09

0.84 (0.68–1.03)

0.09

 

Cohabiting

408/507

267 (65.4)

314 (61.9)

0.31

52.6

49.3

0.41

1.00 (0.85–1.19)

0.98

0.97 (0.80–1.17)

0.71

 
  1. aThe Hazard Ratio (HR), from a Cox proportional hazard regression model, reference group was routine care group. The corresponding 95% CIs and p values are determined using a sandwich estimator for the variance to account for clustering of patients within practices; b p value from a Rao-Scott χ2 test: a Pearson χ2 test adjusted for clustering of patients with general practitioners; c p. value from a log-rank test; dTests whether the effect of randomization differs between groups; e Adjusted for age at diagnosis, sex, clustering, BMI, hypertension, HbA1c, total cholesterol, urinary albumin, physical activity, smoking, known cardiovascular disease (see Table 1) and use of glucose- or lipid-lowering medication and antihypertensive therapy; f highest attained education level (Basic school education only/ higher level of education), g We excluded retired for this analysis