Open Peer Review Reports for: Extended clinical features associated with novel Glis3 mutation: a case report
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sep 2016 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 19 Nov 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Carl Bortner |
| 28 Nov 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - John Gregory |
| 22 Jan 2017 | Author responded | Author comments - naglaa kamal |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 22 Jan 2017 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| Publishing | ||
| 15 Feb 2017 | Editorially accepted | |
| 2 Mar 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s12902-017-0160-z |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
