Skip to main content

Table 2 Foot characteristics of the study cohort by group

From: Plantar pressures are higher in cases with diabetic foot ulcers compared to controls despite a longer stance phase duration

Explanatory measure

DFU group (n = 21)

DMC group (n = 69)

HC group (n = 56)

P value

P value for ulcerated vs. non-ulcerated feet of cases [paired]

Ulcerated feet

Non-ulcerated feetb

Pes planus feet type

14 (66.7 %)

12 (60.0 %)

29 (42.0 %)

19 (33.9 %)

  

Normal arched feet type

4 (19.0 %)

4 (20.0 %)

23 (33.3 %)

20 (35.7 %)

0.146

0.317

Pes cavus feet type

3 (14.3 %)

4 (20.0 %)

17 (24.6 %)

17 (30.4 %)

  

First MTPJ rom (degrees)

30.0 [25.0–45.0]

33.5 [27.5–45.0]a,b

44.0 [30.0–50.0]

45.0 [35.0–60.0]

0.077

0.404

Ankle Joint rom (restricted dorsiflexion)

17 (81.0 %)

16 (80.0 %)

51 (73.9 %)

33 (58.9 %)

0.281

0.368

Subtalar Joint rom (restricted inversion/eversion)

2 (9.5 %)

1 (5.0 %)

3 (4.4 %)

2 (3.6 %)

0.885

0.846

Hallux Abducto Valgus deformity*

 (No deformity)

14 (66.7 %)

14 (70.0 %)

51 (73.9 %)

30 (53.6 %)

0.132

0.392

 (Grade 1)

5 (23.8 %)

4 (20.0 %)

13 (18.8 %)

15 (26.8 %)

 (Grade 2)

1 (4.8 %)

1 (5.0 %)

3 (4.3 %)

10 (17.9 %)

 (Grade 3)

1 (4.8 %)

1 (5.0 %)

2 (2.9 %)

1 (1.8 %)

Claw toe deformity

6 (28.6 %)

8 (40.0 %)

11 (15.9 %)

15 (26.8 %)

0.252

0.500

Hammer toe deformity

12 (57.1 %)a,b

10 (50.0 %)a,b

16 (23.2 %)

9 (16.1 %)

0.001

0.625

Mallet toe deformity

3 (14.3 %)

5 (25.0 %)

14 (20.3 %)

8 (14.3 %)

0.630

0.500

  1. McNemar’s test was performed to assess paired significances between the ulcerated and non-ulcerated feet of the DFU group for categorical outcome and the Wilcoxon Signed Rank test was used to assess continuous variables. a=p <0.05 when compared to the DMC group in post-hoc analysis b=p < 0.05 compared to the HC group in post hoc analysis. *Hallux Abducto Valgus (HAV) deformity grades were based on the Manchester scale [22] as reported in the study protocol [20]. **These outcomes were calculated with a denominator of 20 due to missing data for the non-ulcerated foot of one participant in the case group. rom, range of motion