Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Epidemiology and costs of diabetes mellitus in Switzerland: an analysis of health care claims data, 2006 and 2011

  • Carola A Huber1Email author,
  • Matthias Schwenkglenks2,
  • Roland Rapold1 and
  • Oliver Reich1
BMC Endocrine Disorders201414:44

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6823-14-44

Received: 13 November 2013

Accepted: 28 May 2014

Published: 3 June 2014

Abstract

Background

Quantifying the burden of diabetes mellitus is fundamental for managing patients in health service delivery systems and improves the understanding of the importance of prevention and early intervention of diabetes. In Switzerland, epidemiological data on diabetes are very scarce. In this study we provide a first national overview of the current situation of diabetes mellitus in Switzerland as well as the development of the prevalence, incidence, mortality and costs between 2006 and 2011.

Methods

Using health care claims data of a large health insurance group, current epidemiology and costs were determined from a sample of adult enrollees in 2011. The identification of patients with diabetes was based on prescription data of diabetes related drugs using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification as proxy for clinical diagnosis. We further evaluated changes in epidemiology and costs between 2006 and 2011. All results were weighted with census data to achieve an extrapolation to the Swiss general population level.

Results

A total of 920’402 patients were enrolled in 2011 and 49’757 (5.4%) were identified as diabetes cases. The extrapolated overall prevalence of diabetes in Switzerland was 4.9% (2006, 3.9%). The incidence was 0.58% in 2011 (2007, 0.63%). The extrapolated mortality rate was 2.6% with no significant change over time. Annual diabetes costs to the mandatory health insurance increased from EUR 5,036 per patient in 2006 to EUR 5’331 per patient in 2011.

Conclusions

This study shows a high medical and economic burden of diabetes. The prevalence and costs of diabetes in Switzerland increased substantially over time. Findings stress the need for public health strategies to manage patients with chronic conditions and optimize resource allocation in health service delivery systems.

Keywords

Diabetes Prevalence Incidence Mortality Costs

Background

The management of patients with diabetes mellitus is a major challenge for health care systems. The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) estimates that about 366 million people suffered from diabetes worldwide in 2011, and the prevalence is expected to rise to 552 million by 2030[1]. Diabetes is often associated with microvascular complications and macrovascular complications such as heart disease (heart attack, angina pectoris, heart failure) or hypertension[2, 3], and leads to a significant burden of mortality[4, 5]. Due to medical expenditures attributed to diabetes and its complications, as well as productivity losses of the patients, the economic cost of diabetes is immense[6, 7]. The American Diabetes Association reported that the total estimated cost of diabetes was $174 billion in 2007 in the United States[8].

In Switzerland, epidemiological data providing information on the burden of diabetes are scarce. There are a few studies, which used different approaches to estimate the prevalence[911] or the direct costs of diabetes[12, 13], and showed heterogeneous results. Furthermore, they were based on small study samples, not generalizable to the Swiss population, or are now outdated. Studies providing a current and comprehensive overview of the epidemiology and economic burden of diabetes are completely missing.

In absence of reliable population-based data on diabetes, health care claims data provide a useful basis for assessing the epidemiology and cost of diabetes. Claims data are reliable, longitudinal, cover a large population and are widely used in epidemiological, health services and outcome research e.g.[14].

The aim of the study was to provide at first a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the Swiss situation. Using longitudinal data from a large health insurance population allowed us to assess the current state as well as potential changes in diabetes prevalence, incidence and mortality between 6 years. Moreover, we also aimed to determine the economic burden of diabetes including the total health care costs from a social insurance payer perspective.

Methods

Study design and study population

Health insurance is mandatory in Switzerland and the basic benefit package is the same in the entire country. The database underlying this study included mandatory health insurance claims from approximately 1.2 million persons which lived all over Switzerland and were enrolled with the Helsana Group, consisting of four health and accident insurance plans. In a first step, we defined a sample which included all subjects which were at least 19 years old in 2011 (2011 sample; n = 1’015’106). These data were used to give information about the recent epidemiology and costs of diabetes in Switzerland. In order to additionally identify changes since 2006, we defined a further sample including all persons aged over 19 years in 2006 (2006 sample; n = 920’402). For prevalence and costs estimates, both the 2006 and 2011 samples included patients who were alive and continuously enrolled in the given year. For mortality estimates, we included all individuals. In order to determine the incidence of diabetes, we defined in a next step a retrospective cohort (2006–2011) which included adult persons who were continuously enrolled with Helsana Group during the 6-year period, from January 1, 2006, until December 31, 2011. Subjects who died within this period were also included. This cohort included 477’870 persons at risk in 2006 and 3’993 persons of those were new diabetes cases in 2007 (total: n = 491’863). Available population characteristics included gender, age, language area and type of insurance coverage (managed care model, deductible class). Analyzed data also contained information on patients’ treatment and its associated health care cost; they covered all settings of outpatient and inpatient care and nursing. Since the recorded insurance claims cover almost all health care invoices, the data achieve a high degree of completeness.

According to the national ethical and legal regulation, an ethical approval was not needed. Permission to access the study data was provided by the Helsana Group.

Identification of patients with diabetes mellitus

In absence of epidemiological data including medical diagnoses (e.g. International Classification System, ICD), the WHO Anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC)[15] classification system was used to identify patients with diabetes. Patients were classified as having diabetes when they were prescribed at least one drug for diabetes (hypoglycemic medication or insulin; ATC code A10A), oral blood glucose lowering drug (ATC code A10B) or other drug used in diabetes (ATC code A10X) anytime in a given calendar year. Patients with a prescription for diabetes in a given year were considered as still prevalent in the following year, irrespective of whether were additional prescriptions. This mapping approach allows a direct measure of treated diabetes and is frequently used as a reliable way to identify chronically ill persons in administrative data samples [e.g.16]. Based on previous studies, the use of at least one prescription for diabetes drugs can be used for an accurate identification of patients with diabetes across a large population e.g.[17].

Estimation of prevalence, incidence and mortality

Using our diabetes classification, we calculated diabetes prevalence for the 2006 and 2011 samples. The number of patients with diabetes was divided by all insured persons in the sample in the same year. Prevalence rates were stratified by age and sex. Furthermore, we used census data from the Swiss Federal Office of Statistics to extrapolate the prevalence of patients with diabetes in the general adult population for each year. The characteristics of the of the study population and the entire Swiss population are shown in Table 1. We assumed that our study sample is approximately representative. However, the sample included a slightly higher proportion of elderly persons and the market share of Helsana is not equally distributed in all 26 Swiss cantons. Therefore we used the method of extrapolation. We construct various levels in which the insured persons are represented and weighted the population by the levels which included the entire Swiss population (census data).The stratification for the extrapolation was carried out by age, gender and canton of residence. All 26 Swiss cantons and a total of 16 age classes, which are based on the classification of the risk equalization statistics, were taken into account[18].
Table 1

Characteristics of the study population and the entire Swiss population

 

Study population (2011)

Entire Swiss population (2011)*

 

N

%

N

%

Overall

    

All ages

920402

 

6’407’133

 

19-39

282742

30.72

2’215’128

34.57

40-59

315446

34.27

2’369’500

36.98

>59

322214

35.01

1’822’505

28.44

Women

    

All ages

481616

52.33

3’279’256

51.18

19-39

138936

28.85

1’097’171

33.46

40-59

157528

32.71

1’175’379

35.84

>59

185152

38.44

1’006’706

30.70

Men

    

All ages

438786

47.67

3’127’877

48.82

19-39

143806

32.77

1’117’957

35.74

40-59

157918

35.99

1’194’121

38.18

>59

137062

31.24

815’799

26.08

*according to the census data of the Swiss Federal Office of Statistic[19].

The annual incidence of diabetes was defined as the number of newly identified cases with diabetes divided by the study population which is free of diabetes at the beginning of the given year. Our calculations excluded the number of persons with prevalent diabetes in the first study year. We classified patients as incident cases if they were identified as persons with diabetes in a given year and had a minimum diabetes-free period of one year in the previous years. Incidence estimates were based on the cohort data (2006–2011 cohort) and additionally standardized to the Swiss population using census data.

We included mortality as a further outcome variable. All deaths of the study sample in 2006 and 2011 were recorded but there was no information on cause of death. Therefore, we calculated the annual all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes, and additionally extrapolated to the general Swiss population by census data.

Estimation of costs

The analysis investigating the health care costs of diabetes was conducted from the perspective of the Swiss statutory health insurance system. Annual total health care costs (Swiss Francs (CHF) exchanged to Euro (EUR); rate of 0.81) of diabetes patients were obtained from providers’ claims and defined as the total payments made by the mandatory health insurance for outpatient and inpatient services per patient and year. Costs from the outpatient setting comprised payments for office-based physician visits, hospital outpatient visits, paramedical visits, nursing home, medications, laboratory tests and medical devices. Inpatient costs covered payments for hospital treatments, hospitalizations, rehabilitation, nursing home and emergency transport services. Inpatient costs also cover the cost of medications, laboratory and medical services during the inpatient episode.

Mean annualized costs of diabetes patients including standard deviation were calculated for each age and sex group. Furthermore, we estimated the costs attributable to diabetes by calculating the difference between the mean costs per capita/year in patients with diabetes and the mean cost per capita/year in patients without diabetes. Estimations were based on the 2006 and 2011 samples.

Additionally, we used census data to extrapolate the health care costs of patients with diabetes to the general adult population for each year.

Estimation of time trends

To determine time trends in epidemiology and costs, we additionally estimated logistic regression models using year as a binary variable for comparisons of prevalence, mortality and costs, based on insured persons in the 2006 and 2011 samples. Year was treated as a continuous variable for determining time trends in incidence in the 2006–2011 cohort sample. Estimates were reported as Odds Ratios (OR) including associated 95% confidence interval (95%-CI). All regression models were controlled for age and sex. Given the skewed nature of costs, we used a multiple regression model with log-transformed costs as outcome. Results were given as exponentiated coefficients with 95%-CI. We reported p-values <0.05 as significant. All statistical analyses performed using R, version 2.14.2. For performing the extrapolation the R-package “survey” was used.

Results

Our study population included 920’402 subjects comprising about 50.000 patients with diabetes mellitus in 2011 (Table 2).
Table 2

Age- and sex specific prevalence of diabetes in 2006 and 2011

Prevalence

 

2006

2011

 

Group

No. with diabetes

Population without diabetes

Prevalence rate (%) unadjusted

Prevalence rate (%, 95–CIa) extrapolatedb

No. with diabetes

Population without diabetes

Prevalence rate (%) unadjusted

Prevalence rate (%, 95–CIa) extrapolatedb

Differencec

Overall

         

All ages

41’963

973’143

4.13

3.89 (3.87–3.93)

49’757

870’645

5.41

4.90 (4.86–4.94)

1.01

19–39

1’794

342’167

0.52

0.54 (0.52–0.56)

1’918

280’824

0.68

0.69 (0.65–0.73)

0.15

40–59

9’725

339’452

2.79

2.80 (2.74–2.86)

11’176

304’270

3.54

3.62 (3.54–3.70)

0.82

>59

30’444

291’524

9.46

9.63 (9.53–9.73)

36’663

285’551

11.38

11.68 (11.56–11.80)

2.05

Women

         

All ages

19’609

513’284

3.68

3.37 (3.33–3.41)

22’724

458’892

4.72

4.15 (4.09–4.21)

0.78

19–39

977

167’320

0.58

0.59 (0.55–0.63)

1’094

137’842

0.79

0.79 (0.73–0.85)

0.20

40–59

3’779

173’579

2.13

2.12 (2.06–2.18)

4’419

153’109

2.81

2.79 (2.71–2.87)

0.67

>59

14’853

172’385

7.93

7.98 (7.86–8.10)

17’211

167’941

9.30

9.41 (9.27–9.55)

1.43

Men

         

All ages

22’354

459’859

4.64

4.45 (4.39–4.51)

27’033

411’753

6.16

5.68 (5.62–5.74)

1.23

19–39

817

174’847

0.47

0.48 (0.43–0.51)

824

142’982

0.57

0.58 (0.54–0.62)

0.10

40–59

5’946

165’873

3.46

3.48 (3.40–3.56)

6’757

151’161

4.28

4.44 (4.32–4.56)

0.96

>59

15’591

119’139

11.57

11.74 (11.56–11.92)

19’452

117’610

14.19

14.49 (14.29–14.69)

2.75

a95% Confidence Interval.

bPrevalences are extrapolated to the Swiss general population in 2006 and 2011.

cDifference between the extrapolated prevalence rates in 2006 and 2011.

Prevalence

Table 2 shows the overall prevalence of diabetes of 5.4%. Extrapolated to the adult population of Switzerland, the overall prevalence of diabetes was 4.9% in 2011. The number of patients with diabetes increased with age in both men and women. The extrapolated overall prevalence was higher in men than in women [5.7% (CI: 5.6-6.7) versus 4.2% (CI: 4.1-4.2)] in 2011. However, in the younger age group (19–39 years), women had a higher prevalence rate than men [0.8% (CI: 0.7-0.9) vs. 0.6% (CI: 0.5-0.6)]. In the unadjusted as well as in the extrapolated 2011-sample, all prevalence rates in each subgroups (sex/age) showed the same trends, but at a higher level in the unadjusted sample.

The overall prevalence of diabetes increased from 3.9% in 2006 to 4.9% in 2011. Moreover, the multivariable regression model showed a significant increase of the diabetes prevalence between 2006 and 2011 (OR 1.24, 95%-CI: 1.22-1.26; Table 3).
Table 3

Time trend and change in prevalence, incidence, mortality and costs (2006–2011)

 

OR (95%-CI)a

Outcomes

Logistic regression modelb

Prevalence:

1.24 (1.22-1.26)*

Time change (2006/ 2011)

Incidencec:

0.96 (0.95-0.97)*

Time trend (1-year increase)

Mortalityd:

1.07 (0.99-1.16)

Time change (2006/ 2011)

 

Exp(coefficient)

 

Linear regression model with log-transformed costs b

Costsc:

1.08 (1.06-1.09)*

Time change (2006 to 2011)

aOdds ratio with 95% confidence intervals.

bControlled for age and sex.

cTime trend over the 6-year period 2006–2011.

dAmong persons with diabetes.

*p-value <0.05.

Incidence

All incidence estimates presented in Table 4 showed similar trends both in the unadjusted and the extrapolated sample. The unadjusted overall incidence of diabetes was 0.7%, with a higher rate in men than in women in 2011 (0.9% vs. 0.7%; Table 4). The extrapolated incidence of diabetes in 2011 was overall 0.6%, and 0.7% in men and 0.5% in women. The extrapolated incidence was highest in men aged over 59 years (1.4%).
Table 4

Age- and sex specific incidence of diabetes in 2007 and 2011

Incidence

 

2007

2011

 

Group

No. with new diabetes

Population at risk (2006)

Incidence (%) unadjusted

Incidence (%, 95% CIa) extrapolatedb

No. with new diabetes

Population at risk (2010)

Incidence (%) unadjusted

Incidence (%, 95% CIa) extrapolatedb

Differencec

Overall

         

All ages

3’993

477’870

0.84

0.63 (0.61–0.65)

3’301

447’390

0.74

0.58 (0.56–0.60)

−0.05

19–39

149

88’833

0.17

0.16 (0.13–0.18)

119

85’270

0.14

0.17 (0.14–0.20)

0.01

40–59

1’009

161’989

0.62

0.61 (0.57–0.65)

812

152’714

0.53

0.56 (0.52–0.60)

−0.05

>59

2’835

227’048

1.25

1.26 (1.21–1.31)

2’300

223’395

1.03

1.10 (1.05–1.15)

−0.16

Women

         

All ages

1’918

264’173

0.73

0.54 (0.51–0.57)

1’595

246’612

0.65

0.51 (0.48–0.55)

−0.03

19–39

96

42’879

0.22

0.20 (0.16–0.25)

96

39’872

0.24

0.25 (0.20–0.30)

0.05

40–59

425

84’330

0.50

0.47 (0.42–0.53)

351

74’740

0.47

0.45 (0.44–0.50)

−0.02

>59

1’397

136’964

1.02

1.01 (0.95–1.06)

1’148

132’000

0.87

0.87 (0.82–0.93)

−0.14

Men

         

All ages

2’075

213’697

0.97

0.73 (0.69–0.77)

1’706

200’778

0.85

0.65 (0.61–0.69)

−0.08

19–39

53

45’954

0.12

0.11 ()0.08–0.14

39

44’134

0.09

0.09 (0.06–0.12)

−0.02

40–59

584

77’659

0.75

0.75 (0.67–0.82)

507

69’311

0.73

0.67 (0.60–0.73)

−0.08

>59

1’438

90’084

1.60

1.58 (1.50–1.67)

1’160

87’333

1.33

1.39 (1.30–1.47)

−0.19

a95% Confidence Interval.

bIncidences are extrapolated to the Swiss population in 2007 and 2011.

cDifference between the extrapolated incidences 2007 and 2011.

Overall, the incidence of diabetes decreased from 0.8% in 2006 to 0.7% in 2011, representing a relative change of 12%. The annual relative decrease in incidence was about 4.0% (OR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.95-0.97; Table 3). Decrease in incidence was similar in men and in women (change of 11% resp. 12%) and in persons aged >59 years compared to those aged 40–59 years (change of 18% vs. 15%).

Mortality

Estimations based on the 2006 and 2011 sample were based on 43’444 and 51’547 patients with diabetes, respectively (Table 5).
Table 5

Age- and sex specific mortality rate in prevalent diabetes cases in 2006 and 2011

Mortality

 

2006

2011

 

Group

No. of deathsa

Population with diabetes

Mortality rate (%) unadjusted

Mortality rate (%, 95% CIb) extrapolatedc

No. of deathsa

Population with diabetes

Mortality rate (%) unadjusted

Mortality rate (%, 95% CIb) extrapolatedc

Differenced

Overall

         

All ages

1’148

43’444

2.64

2.49 (2.35–2.63)

1’481

51’547

2.87

2.56 (2.42–2.70)

0.07

19–39

4

1’862

0.21

0.30 (0.02–0.58)

3

1’993

0.15

0.14 (−0.02–0.30)

−0.16

40–59

70

9’995

0.70

0.67 (0.51–0.83)

75

11’424

0.66

0.68 (0.52–0.84)

0.01

>59

1’074

31’587

3.40

3.35 (3.15–3.55)

1’403

38’130

3.68

3.46 (3.28–3.64)

0.11

Women

         

All ages

525

20’239

2.59

2.50 (2.28–2.72)

670

23’538

2.85

2.53 (2.33–2.73)

0.03

19–39

2

1’011

0.20

0.27 (−0.09–0.63)

2

1’126

0.18

0.16 (−0.06–0.38)

−0.11

40–59

23

3’866

0.59

0.60 (0.36–0.84)

21

4’518

0.46

0.49 (0.27–0.71)

−0.11

>59

500

15’362

3.25

3.27 (2.99–3.55)

647

17’894

3.62

3.44 (3.30–3.58)

0.17

Men

         

All ages

623

23’205

2.68

2.49 (2.29–2.69)

811

28’009

2.90

2.57 (2.39–2.75)

0.08

19–39

2

851

0.24

0.34 (−0.12–0.80)

1

867

0.12

0.12 (−0.10–0.34)

−0.22

40–59

47

6’129

0.77

0.72 (0.52–0.92)

54

6’906

0.78

0.80 (0.58–1.02)

0.08

>59

574

16’225

3.54

3.41 (3.13–3.69)

756

20’236

3.74

3.48 (3.24–3.72)

0.07

aAmong persons with diabetes.

b95% Confidence Interval.

cMortality rates are extrapolated to the Swiss population in 2006 and 2011.

dDifference between the extrapolated mortality rates 2006 and 2011.

The unadjusted annual all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes in 2011 was 2.9%, and the extrapolated mortality 2.6%, with no significant differences between the sexes [2.5% (CI: 2.3-2.7) vs. 2.5% (CI: 2.4-2.8), Table 5]. As with prevalence and incidence, mortality was higher in older persons than in younger persons in the unadjusted as well as in the extrapolated sample.

The extrapolated all-cause mortality rate slightly increased from 2.5% in 2006 to 2.6% in 2011. However, the logistic regression model showed no significant increase in mortality between 2006 and 2011 (OR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.99-1.16; Table 3).

Costs

As presented in Table 6, annual total health care costs (Euro (EUR)) of diabetes patients showed similar trends both in the unadjusted and the extrapolated sample. Overall, diabetes patients accrued total health care costs of EUR 8’424 (unadjusted) and EUR 8’239 (extrapolated), respectively, per patient and year in 2011. Extrapolated mean costs in women were higher than in men (EUR 8’679 vs. EUR 7’902) and highest in patients aged over 59 years (EUR 8’993).
Table 6

Age- and sex specific mean costs in patients with and without diabetes 2006 and 2011

Costs

 

2006

2011

Group

Patients with diabetes

Patients without diabetes

Patients with diabetes

Patients without diabetes

Mean costs (EUR) unadjusted

Mean costs (EUR) extrapolateda

Mean costs (EUR) unadjusted

Mean costs (EUR) extrapolateda

Costs attributable to diabetesb

Mean costs (EUR) unadjusted

Mean costs (EUR) extrapolateda

Mean costs (EUR) unadjusted

Mean costs (EUR) extrapolateda

Costs attributable to diabetesb

Overall

          

All ages

7489

7495

2564

2459

5036

8424

8239

3157

2907

5331

19–39

6350

6533

1264

1293

5241

6589

6798

1567

1567

5231

40–59

6226

6264

1963

1967

4296

6703

6613

2349

2389

4224

>59

7960

8038

4790

4799

3239

9048

8993

5583

5471

3522

Women

          

All ages

7916

7957

3008

2882

5075

8837

8679

3699

3402

5277

19–39

6304

6504

1665

1693

4811

6974

7238

2074

2066

5173

40–59

6764

6853

2219

2234

4619

7110

7079

2672

2717

4363

>59

8319

8424

5105

5147

3277

9404

9361

5971

5851

3510

Men

          

All ages

7116

7121

2069

2003

5118

8078

7902

2553

2381

5521

19–39

6404

6569

880

893

5676

6077

6207

1078

1080

5127

40–59

5885

5909

1697

1700

4209

6437

6325

2023

2061

4265

>59

7622

7701

4332

4334

3367

8732

8697

5030

4973

3724

aMean costs are extrapolated to the Swiss population in 2006 and 2011.

bDifference between the extrapolated mean costs in 2006 and 2011.

The extrapolated annual costs attributable to diabetes (i.e. difference in mean costs between insured persons with vs. without diabetes) were EUR 5’331 in 2011, with higher costs in men than in woman (EUR 5’521 vs. EUR 5’277). The lowest costs were observed in the age group >59 years, in both sexes.

Overall, the costs attributable to diabetes increased from EUR 5’036 in 2006 to EUR 5’331 in 2011. Regression analysis showed a significant increase in costs among patients with diabetes between 2006 and 2011 (coefficient 1.08, 95% CI: 1.06-1.09; Table 3).

Discussion

This study is the first national study to provide a comprehensive overview of the burden of diabetes mellitus in Switzerland. Based on a large data set, we estimated the current state as well as the development in diabetes prevalence, incidence, mortality and cost-of-illness between 2006 and 2011.

This study yielded an population prevalence of 4.9% in 2011. Our finding is lower than the prevalence rate of the Swiss CoLaus study (6%) of subjects aged 35–75 years and living in Lausanne in 2003[9]. However, prevalence results originating from other studies performed in Switzerland were significantly lower than our result which might be explained by variations in study design and definition of diagnosed diabetes. For example, Bopp et al.[10] analyzed diagnoses of hospital discharges and the death registry and reported a diabetes prevalence of about 3.5-4.3% in 2007/2008. This finding might be an underestimation, since diabetes is often not the primary reason for hospitalization and thus not stated in all medical records. Our estimates of prevalence and upward time trend are more in line with international studies reporting higher prevalence levels in the general population. For example, Wilke et al.[20] reported a standardized prevalence of 5.5% for patients with Type 2 diabetes of all ages in Germany in 2008. Additionally, we observed a significant increase in diabetes prevalence between 2006 and 2011. This increasing trend is in line with estimates from Germany[6] and Canada[5] and from global estimates of the IDF Atlas (International Diabetes Federation), which predicted a major increase of 51% in worldwide cases with diabetes by 2030[1].

While the diabetes prevalence in the Swiss population is increasing, our study suggests a decreasing incidence of treated diabetes over the 6-year time period. The extrapolated incidence of diabetes showed a relative decrease by 8% (percentage change from 2007 to 2011). Previous studies performed in Canada, U.S. and Italy, examining trends in diabetes incidence provide conflicting results[5, 21, 22]. Differences in incidence trends of diabetes might be associated with several risk factors such as lifestyle habits (i.e. smoking), overweight and environmental patterns which vary between countries and cultures. Since obesity as a strong risk factor for diabetes is rising in Switzerland[23], the observed decrease in diabetes incidence suggests a meaningful improvement in other diabetes related risk factors. Previous research has shown the positive impact of lifestyle interventions (exercise and/or diet) to reduce the diabetes incidence and indicates that the effectiveness of the intervention is independent from weight-changes[24]. However, time-point incidence rates of most previous studies corroborate the results of our study, where the estimated diabetes incidence was 0.5-0.9%.

Our all-cause mortality estimates for diabetes patients are higher than those found in other studies[5, 25, 26]. For example, findings from Canada reported a decrease of 3.3 to 1.6 in all-cause mortality from 1995 to 2005[5]. However, comparability is limited since considered time intervals differ from each other.

In this study, we also determined the mean annual direct medical costs of diabetes. Patients with diabetes caused health care costs of EUR 8‘239 per year; comparison with persons without diabetes lead to a total of EUR 5’331 per patient attributable to diabetes in 2011. Our cost estimates from 2011 suggest a meaningful increase in direct costs (excluding nursing home), when comparing with previous national estimates in patients with type 2 diabetes from 1998/1999 (EUR 2’232)[12]. Comparison with international results is difficult as health systems, medical practice and unit cost differ greatly. Köster et al.[6] showed that the average health care costs (including nursing home) of patients with diabetes in Germany were EUR 5’726 in 2007 and that the costs attributable to diabetes were EUR 2’605. Another study calculating the medical costs of diabetes from the U.S. reported an annual cost (including nursing care) per diabetes case of EUR 5’120 in 2007[27], which is meaningful lower than findings from our study. Additionally, our results show an increase of the cost attributable to diabetes in 2006 to 2011. This finding is in line with internationally reported data showing an increase of health care costs over the past years[28, 29]. According to our results, about 387’100 persons (4.9% of 8 million Swiss residents) were diagnosed with diabetes and treated in 2011. This implies total health care costs attributable for diabetes in the compulsory health insurance of CHF 2.5 billion, corresponding to 9.5% of total Swiss statutory health insurance expenditures in 2011. This finding represents a significant burden of disease in Switzerland, and is expected to rise in the future, due to demographic changes as increasing life expectancy and increasing number of elderly patients[30]. In addition, with the current increase in overweight and obesity observed in Switzerland[23], it stresses the need for public health strategies to manage patients with diabetes and optimize resource allocations in health service delivery systems. The promotion of chronic care management might be an effective approach to manage and improve health care for patients with diabetes[31] and adequately prepare for the increasing burden of diabetes on health care resources. Moreover, our results highlight the importance of prevention and early intervention of diabetes mellitus, especially in the elderly population. There is a meaningful impact of age on the occurrence of diabetes mellitus. The percentage of elderly persons continues to rise and older people are faced with chronic diseases and multimorbidity. Previous research has shown that lifestyle interventions are very effective in preventing or delaying the occurrence of chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus[23, 32]. Physical activity and healthy diet helps to prevent diabetes (type 2). Public health efforts should notably address the prevention of diabetes in the elderly population and give it a priority in health policy, decision-making and resource allocation debates.

Several strengths and limitations of our study have to be taken into account. The main strength is that the study is based on a very comprehensive health care claims database which covers a large and geographically diverse Swiss population and allows for a good and low cost monitoring of diabetes occurrence. Since we additionally performed an extrapolation of our estimates to the general adult population, we regard our results as being representative for the prevalence, incidence, mortality and cost of diabetes for Switzerland. The study also has several limitations. First, the number of patients with diabetes may be biased, because clinical diagnoses (e.g., ICD-10) were not available. Additionally, our prevalence might be underestimated. Undiagnosed persons with diabetes, patients with lifestyle-treatment and patients with diabetes who were non-adherent to their medication could not be included in the study. However, diagnoses based on dispended medications are a valid proxy for medical diagnoses and widely used in epidemiological and outcomes research to assess prevalence[14, 16]. Second, cost estimates may be slightly too low as about 3% of the used claims were not paid by the health insurer but directly by the patient (out-of-pocket). Third, our cost estimates might be slightly overestimated, since the data do not allow a distinction between the costs of the treatment of diabetes solely and the costs of its major comorbidities. Further research is needed to estimate the costs of diabetes considering the occurrence of diabetes specific complications such as cardiovascular diseases. A fourth limitation of this study is that incidence trend estimations are not completely representative of the general population, because our cohort only included continuously enrolled patients; persons newly insured during the observation period were not covered. Since we have more or less high fluctuations in our stock of insured persons over the years, we assumed to have a switching bias in calculating the incidence. However, to define a consistent cohort of persons and to follow them over several years it is a very common and frequently used method to determine trends in diseases. Cohort studies are very important in giving us a lot of epidemiological information. Using this study design allows us to see what happens to them with diabetes as well as to see who will develop a new disease. We are able to follow the patients and thus to assess the incidence and its trend.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study shows a high medical and economic impact of diabetes mellitus. The prevalence and costs of diabetes in Switzerland increased substantially between 2006 and 2011. These findings highlight the need for improvements in prevention and early intervention of diabetes mellitus. Effective strategies should be developed to manage patients with chronic conditions and to optimize resource allocations in health service delivery systems of those with diabetes.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study received funding from Merck, Sharp and Dohme & Co (MSD), Switzerland. We thank MSD for supporting our study. CH, RR and OR received funding from MSD.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Health Sciences, Helsana Insurance Group
(2)
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Zürich

References

  1. Whiting DR, Guariguata L, Weil C, Shaw J: IDF diabetes atlas: global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011, 94: 311-321. 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.10.029.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Struijs JN, Baan CA, Schellevis FG, Westert GP, van den Bos GA: Comorbidity in patients with diabetes mellitus: impact on medical health care utilization. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006, 6: 84-10.1186/1472-6963-6-84.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Mo F, Pogany LM, Li FC, Morrison H: Prevalence of diabetes and cardiovascular comorbidity in the Canadian Community Health Survey 2002–2003. Scientific World Journal. 2006, 6: 96-105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Roglic G, Unwin N, Bennett PH, Mathers C, Tuomilehto J, Nag S, Connolly V, King H: The burden of mortality attributable to diabetes: realistic estimates for the year 2000. Diabetes Care. 2005, 28: 2130-2135. 10.2337/diacare.28.9.2130.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lipscombe LL, Hux JE: Trends in diabetes prevalence, incidence, and mortality in Ontario, Canada 1995–2005: a population-based study. Lancet. 2007, 369: 750-756. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60361-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Köster I, Huppertz E, Hauner H, Schubert I: Direct costs of diabetes mellitus in Germany - CoDiM 2000–2007. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2011, 119: 377-385. 10.1055/s-0030-1269847.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Jönsson B, CODE-2 Advisory Board: Revealing the cost of Type II diabetes in Europe. Diabetologia. 2002, 45: S5-S12. 10.1007/s00125-002-0858-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. American Diabetes Association: Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2007. Diabetes Care. 2008, 31: 596-615.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaiser A, Vollenweider P, Waeber G, Marques-Vidal P: Prevalence, awareness and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Switzerland: the CoLaus study. Diabet Med. 2012, 29: 190-197. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03422.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bopp M, Zellweger U, Faeh D: Routine data sources challenge international diabetes Federation extrapolations of national diabetes prevalence in Switzerland. Diabetes Care. 2011, 34: 2387-2389. 10.2337/dc11-0157.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Rizza A, Kaplan V, Senn O, Rosemann T, Bhend H, Tandjung R, FIRE study group: Age- and gender-related prevalence of multimorbidity in primary care: the swiss fire project. BMC Fam Pract. 2012, 13: 113-10.1186/1471-2296-13-113.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Schmitt-Koopmann I, Schwenkglenks M, Spinas GA, Szucs TD: Direct medical costs of type 2 diabetes and its complications in Switzerland. Eur J Public Health. 2004, 14: 3-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Weber C, Schneider B, Lodwig V, Holm MV, Neeser K: Cost impact of blood glucose self-monitoring on complications of type 2 diabetes: a Swiss perspective (ROSSO study No.11). Swiss Med Wkly. 2007, 137: 545-550.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. O‘Shea M, Teeling M, Bennett K: The prevalence and ingredient cost of chronic comorbidity in the Irish elderly population with medication treated type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cross-sectional study using a national pharmacy claims database. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013, 13: 23-10.1186/1472-6963-13-23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology: Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 2011. 2010, Oslo: WHOGoogle Scholar
  16. Lamers LM, van Vliet RC: The Pharmacy-based Cost Group model: validating and adjusting the classification of medications for chronic conditions to the Dutch situation. Health Policy. 2004, 68: 113-121. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.09.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Tu K, Manuel D, Lam K, Kavanagh D, Mitiku TF, Guo H: Diabetics can be identified in an electronic medical record using laboratory tests and prescriptions. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011, 64: 431-435. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Common Institution of Health Insurance Law 2012. Gemeinsame Einrichtung Krankenversicherungsgesetz, KVG, [http://www.kvg.org/de/risikoausgleich-_content---1--1047.html]
  19. Swiss Federal Office of Statistic. [http://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/portal/de/index/themen/01/02/blank/key/alter/gesamt.html]
  20. Wilke T, Ahrendt P, Schwartz D, Linder R, Ahrens S, Verheyen F: Incidence and prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Germany: an analysis based on 5.43 million patients. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2013, 138: 69-75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Tabaei BP, Chamany S, Driver CR, Kerker B, Silver L: Incidence of self-reported diabetes in New York City, 2002, 2004, and 2008. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012, 9: E114-PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Monesi L, Baviera M, Marzona I, Avanzini F, Monesi G, Nobili A, Tettamanti M, Cortesi L, Riva E, Fortino I, Bortolotti A, Fontana G, Merlino L, Roncaglioni MC: Prevalence, incidence and mortality of diagnosed diabetes: evidence from an Italian population-based study. Diabet Med. 2012, 29: 385-392. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03446.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Marques-Vidal P, Bovet P, Paccaud F, Chiolero A: Changes of overweight and obesity in the adult Swiss population according to educational level, from 1992 to 2007. BMC Public Health. 2010, 10: 87-10.1186/1471-2458-10-87.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Li G, Zhang P, Wang J, Gregg EW, Yang W, Gong Q, Li H, Li H, Jiang Y, An Y, Shuai Y, Zhang B, Zhang J, Thompson TJ, Gerzoff RB, Roglic G, Hu Y, Bennett PH: The long-term effect of lifestyle interventions to prevent diabetes in the China Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Study: a 20-year follow-up study. Lancet. 2008, 371: 1783-1789. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60766-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gregg EW, Gu Q, Cheng YJ, Narayan KM, Cowie CC: Mortality trends in men and women with diabetes, 1971 to 2000. Ann Intern Med. 2007, 147: 149-155. 10.7326/0003-4819-147-3-200708070-00167.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Preis SR, Hwang SJ, Coady S, Pencina MJ, D‘Agostino RB, Savage PJ, Levy D, Fox CS: Trends in all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality among women and men with and without diabetes mellitus in the Framingham Heart Study, 1950 to 2005. Circulation. 2009, 119: 1728-1735. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.829176.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Dall TM, Zhang Y, Chen YJ, Quick WW, Yang WG, Fogli J: The economic burden of diabetes. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010, 29: 297-303. 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0155.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Kanavos P, van den Aardweg S, Schurer W: Diabetes expenditures, burden of disease and management in 5 EU countries. LSE Health, London School of Economics, [http://www2.lse.ac.uk/LSEHealthAndSocialCare/research/LSEHealth/MTRG/LSEDiabetesReport26Jan2012.pdf]
  29. Zhang P, Zhang X, Brown J, Vistisen D, Sicree R, Shaw J, Nichols G: Global healthcare expenditure on diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010, 87: 293-301. 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.01.026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Leon DA: Trends in European life expectancy: a salutary view. Int J Epidemiol. 2011, 40: 271-277. 10.1093/ije/dyr061.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Coleman K, Austin BT, Brach C, Wagner EH: Evidence on the Chronic Care Model in the new millennium. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009, 28: 75-85. 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Lindström J, Ilanne-Parikka P, Peltonen M, Aunola S, Eriksson JG, Hemiö K, Hämäläinen H, Härkönen P, Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S, Laakso M, Louheranta A, Mannelin M, Paturi M, Sundvall J, Valle TT, Uusitupa M, Tuomilehto J, Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study Group: Sustained reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle intervention: follow-up of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Lancet. 2006, 368: 1673-1679. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69701-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6823/14/44/prepub

Copyright

© Huber et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Comments