Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Efficacy of alogliptin in type 2 diabetes treatment: a meta-analysis of randomized double-blind controlled studies

BMC Endocrine Disorders201313:9

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6823-13-9

Received: 19 September 2012

Accepted: 27 February 2013

Published: 1 March 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Sep 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Apostolos Tsapas
11 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Abd Tahrani
17 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - marc rendell
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Apostolos Tsapas
17 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - marc rendell
19 Dec 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Abd Tahrani
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
15 Jan 2013 Author responded Author comments - Yifru Berhan
28 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Apostolos Tsapas
30 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - marc rendell
Resubmission - Version 5
15 Jan 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
27 Feb 2013 Editorially accepted
1 Mar 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6823-13-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Hawassa University College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa University

Advertisement