Reasons given by general practitioners for non-treatment decisions in younger and older patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus in the United Kingdom: a survey study
© Zhang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 18 April 2011
Accepted: 28 October 2011
Published: 28 October 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Apr 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Petra Denig|
|24 Jun 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Louis Kuritzky|
|21 Jul 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Qiaoyi Zhang|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Jul 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Petra Denig|
|23 Sep 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Qiaoyi Zhang|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|23 Sep 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|27 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Petra Denig|
|20 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Qiaoyi Zhang|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|20 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|28 Oct 2011||Editorially accepted|
|28 Oct 2011||Article published||10.1186/1472-6823-11-17|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.